"The Pentateuch that the Samaritans Chose”. Moderne fejlslutninger vedrørende den samaritanske Pentateuks oprindelse og karakteristika

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

"The Pentateuch that the Samaritans Chose”. Moderne fejlslutninger vedrørende den samaritanske Pentateuks oprindelse og karakteristika. / Hjelm, Ingrid.

I: Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift, Bind 78, Nr. 3, 2015, s. 225-242.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Hjelm, I 2015, '"The Pentateuch that the Samaritans Chose”. Moderne fejlslutninger vedrørende den samaritanske Pentateuks oprindelse og karakteristika', Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift, bind 78, nr. 3, s. 225-242.

APA

Hjelm, I. (2015). "The Pentateuch that the Samaritans Chose”. Moderne fejlslutninger vedrørende den samaritanske Pentateuks oprindelse og karakteristika. Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift, 78(3), 225-242.

Vancouver

Hjelm I. "The Pentateuch that the Samaritans Chose”. Moderne fejlslutninger vedrørende den samaritanske Pentateuks oprindelse og karakteristika. Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift. 2015;78(3):225-242.

Author

Hjelm, Ingrid. / "The Pentateuch that the Samaritans Chose”. Moderne fejlslutninger vedrørende den samaritanske Pentateuks oprindelse og karakteristika. I: Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift. 2015 ; Bind 78, Nr. 3. s. 225-242.

Bibtex

@article{3445409d2fc84e96b1842005e3e94f85,
title = "{"}The Pentateuch that the Samaritans Chose”.: Moderne fejlslutninger vedr{\o}rende den samaritanske Pentateuks oprindelse og karakteristika",
abstract = "”The Pentateuch that the Samaritans Chose”, is the heading of Chapter Seven in Magnar Kartveit{\textquoteright}s The Origin of the Samaritans (2009). The heading is highly problematic in regard to both the origin of the Samaritans and the production of biblical texts and books in ancient Palestine. Kartveit{\textquoteright}s assumption that the Samaritans ”chose one text-type in particular among the different texts available” rests on several old paradigms about Samaritan origins and religion, which badly fit recent evidence from archeology and epigraphy. A continuous and independent Yahvistic cult in Israel, from at least the Iron Age, a temple on Mt Gerizim from early in the Persian period, and a highly developed temple city on Mt Gerizim in the Hellenistic period, do not sustain paradigms about Samaritans as an ”aberrant” branch of Judaism or the Samaritan Pentateuch as an off-shoot of a Jewish pre-Samaritan or proto-Masoretic Pentateuch. ",
author = "Ingrid Hjelm",
year = "2015",
language = "Dansk",
volume = "78",
pages = "225--242",
journal = "Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift",
issn = "0105-3191",
publisher = "Eksistensen",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - "The Pentateuch that the Samaritans Chose”.

T2 - Moderne fejlslutninger vedrørende den samaritanske Pentateuks oprindelse og karakteristika

AU - Hjelm, Ingrid

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - ”The Pentateuch that the Samaritans Chose”, is the heading of Chapter Seven in Magnar Kartveit’s The Origin of the Samaritans (2009). The heading is highly problematic in regard to both the origin of the Samaritans and the production of biblical texts and books in ancient Palestine. Kartveit’s assumption that the Samaritans ”chose one text-type in particular among the different texts available” rests on several old paradigms about Samaritan origins and religion, which badly fit recent evidence from archeology and epigraphy. A continuous and independent Yahvistic cult in Israel, from at least the Iron Age, a temple on Mt Gerizim from early in the Persian period, and a highly developed temple city on Mt Gerizim in the Hellenistic period, do not sustain paradigms about Samaritans as an ”aberrant” branch of Judaism or the Samaritan Pentateuch as an off-shoot of a Jewish pre-Samaritan or proto-Masoretic Pentateuch.

AB - ”The Pentateuch that the Samaritans Chose”, is the heading of Chapter Seven in Magnar Kartveit’s The Origin of the Samaritans (2009). The heading is highly problematic in regard to both the origin of the Samaritans and the production of biblical texts and books in ancient Palestine. Kartveit’s assumption that the Samaritans ”chose one text-type in particular among the different texts available” rests on several old paradigms about Samaritan origins and religion, which badly fit recent evidence from archeology and epigraphy. A continuous and independent Yahvistic cult in Israel, from at least the Iron Age, a temple on Mt Gerizim from early in the Persian period, and a highly developed temple city on Mt Gerizim in the Hellenistic period, do not sustain paradigms about Samaritans as an ”aberrant” branch of Judaism or the Samaritan Pentateuch as an off-shoot of a Jewish pre-Samaritan or proto-Masoretic Pentateuch.

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

VL - 78

SP - 225

EP - 242

JO - Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift

JF - Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift

SN - 0105-3191

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 153344663