Collaboration in a Distributed Research Program: Islands of Intensity in a Sea of Minimal Interaction

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikel

Standard

Collaboration in a Distributed Research Program: Islands of Intensity in a Sea of Minimal Interaction. / Haman, Magdalena; Hertzum, Morten.

I: Journal of Documentation, Bind 75, Nr. 2, 2019, s. 334-348.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikel

Harvard

Haman, M & Hertzum, M 2019, 'Collaboration in a Distributed Research Program: Islands of Intensity in a Sea of Minimal Interaction', Journal of Documentation, bind 75, nr. 2, s. 334-348. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-05-2018-0078

APA

Haman, M., & Hertzum, M. (2019). Collaboration in a Distributed Research Program: Islands of Intensity in a Sea of Minimal Interaction. Journal of Documentation, 75(2), 334-348. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-05-2018-0078

Vancouver

Haman M, Hertzum M. Collaboration in a Distributed Research Program: Islands of Intensity in a Sea of Minimal Interaction. Journal of Documentation. 2019;75(2):334-348. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-05-2018-0078

Author

Haman, Magdalena ; Hertzum, Morten. / Collaboration in a Distributed Research Program: Islands of Intensity in a Sea of Minimal Interaction. I: Journal of Documentation. 2019 ; Bind 75, Nr. 2. s. 334-348.

Bibtex

@article{3ad0c3cff0af4d13bbc4e0f516ab349d,
title = "Collaboration in a Distributed Research Program: Islands of Intensity in a Sea of Minimal Interaction",
abstract = "Purpose – Researchers need to collaborate to address grand challenges such as climate change, poverty, and sustainable food production. We investigate how the researchers in a globally distributed research program interact to move their research forward.Design/methodology/approach – We interviewed 14 participants in the research program.Findings – In spite of the spatial distribution of the researchers the output from the research program is predominantly collaborative; as much as 79{\%} of the publications are co-authored by researchers from multiple countries. However, the researchers mostly work alone on their contributions to their joint work and spend minimal time interacting. This strategy of minimal interaction is punctuated by islands of intense interaction when they occasionally meet in person. Interaction feels natural, productive, and satisfying to them when they are co-located but less so when they are distributed, probably because they experience technology-mediated interaction over a distance as somewhat impoverished. The interviewees mention that the minimal-interaction strategy incurs the risks of cracks in common ground and of misconstruing minimal interaction as lack of commitment. But the strategy is generally well-liked.Research limitations/implications – The experience of technology-mediated interaction as impoverished points to an explanation for the finding of less interaction in distributed than co-located research. It should be noted that the study is restricted to one research program.Originality/value – By questioning widely touted recommendations for ongoing, regular, and sustained interaction this study provides a fresh look at scientific collaboration.",
keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, Scientific collaboration, Global research, Team science, Distributed work, Minimal interaction",
author = "Magdalena Haman and Morten Hertzum",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1108/JD-05-2018-0078",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "334--348",
journal = "Journal of Documentation",
issn = "0022-0418",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collaboration in a Distributed Research Program: Islands of Intensity in a Sea of Minimal Interaction

AU - Haman, Magdalena

AU - Hertzum, Morten

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Purpose – Researchers need to collaborate to address grand challenges such as climate change, poverty, and sustainable food production. We investigate how the researchers in a globally distributed research program interact to move their research forward.Design/methodology/approach – We interviewed 14 participants in the research program.Findings – In spite of the spatial distribution of the researchers the output from the research program is predominantly collaborative; as much as 79% of the publications are co-authored by researchers from multiple countries. However, the researchers mostly work alone on their contributions to their joint work and spend minimal time interacting. This strategy of minimal interaction is punctuated by islands of intense interaction when they occasionally meet in person. Interaction feels natural, productive, and satisfying to them when they are co-located but less so when they are distributed, probably because they experience technology-mediated interaction over a distance as somewhat impoverished. The interviewees mention that the minimal-interaction strategy incurs the risks of cracks in common ground and of misconstruing minimal interaction as lack of commitment. But the strategy is generally well-liked.Research limitations/implications – The experience of technology-mediated interaction as impoverished points to an explanation for the finding of less interaction in distributed than co-located research. It should be noted that the study is restricted to one research program.Originality/value – By questioning widely touted recommendations for ongoing, regular, and sustained interaction this study provides a fresh look at scientific collaboration.

AB - Purpose – Researchers need to collaborate to address grand challenges such as climate change, poverty, and sustainable food production. We investigate how the researchers in a globally distributed research program interact to move their research forward.Design/methodology/approach – We interviewed 14 participants in the research program.Findings – In spite of the spatial distribution of the researchers the output from the research program is predominantly collaborative; as much as 79% of the publications are co-authored by researchers from multiple countries. However, the researchers mostly work alone on their contributions to their joint work and spend minimal time interacting. This strategy of minimal interaction is punctuated by islands of intense interaction when they occasionally meet in person. Interaction feels natural, productive, and satisfying to them when they are co-located but less so when they are distributed, probably because they experience technology-mediated interaction over a distance as somewhat impoverished. The interviewees mention that the minimal-interaction strategy incurs the risks of cracks in common ground and of misconstruing minimal interaction as lack of commitment. But the strategy is generally well-liked.Research limitations/implications – The experience of technology-mediated interaction as impoverished points to an explanation for the finding of less interaction in distributed than co-located research. It should be noted that the study is restricted to one research program.Originality/value – By questioning widely touted recommendations for ongoing, regular, and sustained interaction this study provides a fresh look at scientific collaboration.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - Scientific collaboration

KW - Global research

KW - Team science

KW - Distributed work

KW - Minimal interaction

U2 - 10.1108/JD-05-2018-0078

DO - 10.1108/JD-05-2018-0078

M3 - Journal article

VL - 75

SP - 334

EP - 348

JO - Journal of Documentation

JF - Journal of Documentation

SN - 0022-0418

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 204352381