National Identity, Shared Values, and Social Cohesion

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

National Identity, Shared Values, and Social Cohesion. / Holtug, Nils.

Handbook of Patriotism. red. / Mitja Sardoc. Cham : Springer, 2018.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Holtug, N 2018, National Identity, Shared Values, and Social Cohesion. i M Sardoc (red.), Handbook of Patriotism. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30534-9_52-1

APA

Holtug, N. (2018). National Identity, Shared Values, and Social Cohesion. I M. Sardoc (red.), Handbook of Patriotism Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30534-9_52-1

Vancouver

Holtug N. National Identity, Shared Values, and Social Cohesion. I Sardoc M, red., Handbook of Patriotism. Cham: Springer. 2018 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30534-9_52-1

Author

Holtug, Nils. / National Identity, Shared Values, and Social Cohesion. Handbook of Patriotism. red. / Mitja Sardoc. Cham : Springer, 2018.

Bibtex

@inbook{928a1d332cfb4b7785d913e04549991b,
title = "National Identity, Shared Values, and Social Cohesion",
abstract = "According to the national identity argument, the sharing of a national identity tends to facilitate social cohesion, including trust and solidarity. On this basis, nationalists have, for example, argued that states’ immigration and integration policies need to reflect a concern with their national identities and the forms of homogeneity on which they depend. First, the national identity argument is outlined in greater detail as is the concept of social cohesion. Second, different possible explanations of why shared identities might impact social cohesion are described. Third, the national identity argument is explained in terms of the commitments of nationalism, from which it derives. Fourth, this paves the way for a survey of the empirical evidence that may support or undermine the national identity argument. It is argued that this argument does not find support in the available empirical studies. Finally, it is briefly considered whether there are other identities, apart from national identities, that may contribute to social cohesion at the societal level. In particular, liberal and multicultural values are considered.",
keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, National identity, Nationalism, Social cohesion, Trust, Solidarity, Redistribution, Identity thesis, Direct and indirect effects, Liberalism, Multiculturalism",
author = "Nils Holtug",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-30534-9_52-1",
language = "English",
editor = "Mitja Sardoc",
booktitle = "Handbook of Patriotism",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - National Identity, Shared Values, and Social Cohesion

AU - Holtug, Nils

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - According to the national identity argument, the sharing of a national identity tends to facilitate social cohesion, including trust and solidarity. On this basis, nationalists have, for example, argued that states’ immigration and integration policies need to reflect a concern with their national identities and the forms of homogeneity on which they depend. First, the national identity argument is outlined in greater detail as is the concept of social cohesion. Second, different possible explanations of why shared identities might impact social cohesion are described. Third, the national identity argument is explained in terms of the commitments of nationalism, from which it derives. Fourth, this paves the way for a survey of the empirical evidence that may support or undermine the national identity argument. It is argued that this argument does not find support in the available empirical studies. Finally, it is briefly considered whether there are other identities, apart from national identities, that may contribute to social cohesion at the societal level. In particular, liberal and multicultural values are considered.

AB - According to the national identity argument, the sharing of a national identity tends to facilitate social cohesion, including trust and solidarity. On this basis, nationalists have, for example, argued that states’ immigration and integration policies need to reflect a concern with their national identities and the forms of homogeneity on which they depend. First, the national identity argument is outlined in greater detail as is the concept of social cohesion. Second, different possible explanations of why shared identities might impact social cohesion are described. Third, the national identity argument is explained in terms of the commitments of nationalism, from which it derives. Fourth, this paves the way for a survey of the empirical evidence that may support or undermine the national identity argument. It is argued that this argument does not find support in the available empirical studies. Finally, it is briefly considered whether there are other identities, apart from national identities, that may contribute to social cohesion at the societal level. In particular, liberal and multicultural values are considered.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - National identity

KW - Nationalism

KW - Social cohesion

KW - Trust

KW - Solidarity

KW - Redistribution

KW - Identity thesis

KW - Direct and indirect effects

KW - Liberalism

KW - Multiculturalism

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-30534-9_52-1

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-30534-9_52-1

M3 - Book chapter

BT - Handbook of Patriotism

A2 - Sardoc, Mitja

PB - Springer

CY - Cham

ER -

ID: 201149452