Af en endnu Levendes Papirer: Kritik af en mislykket dannelsesroman?

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Af en endnu Levendes Papirer : Kritik af en mislykket dannelsesroman? / Garff, Joakim.

Danske Studier. Bind 2022 Universitets-Jubilæets danske Samfund, 2022. s. 51-68.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Garff, J 2022, Af en endnu Levendes Papirer: Kritik af en mislykket dannelsesroman? i Danske Studier. bind 2022, Universitets-Jubilæets danske Samfund, s. 51-68.

APA

Garff, J. (2022). Af en endnu Levendes Papirer: Kritik af en mislykket dannelsesroman? I Danske Studier (Bind 2022, s. 51-68). Universitets-Jubilæets danske Samfund.

Vancouver

Garff J. Af en endnu Levendes Papirer: Kritik af en mislykket dannelsesroman? I Danske Studier. Bind 2022. Universitets-Jubilæets danske Samfund. 2022. s. 51-68

Author

Garff, Joakim. / Af en endnu Levendes Papirer : Kritik af en mislykket dannelsesroman?. Danske Studier. Bind 2022 Universitets-Jubilæets danske Samfund, 2022. s. 51-68

Bibtex

@inbook{e1aac8dda2fd4c7cb131cce40238a96e,
title = "Af en endnu Levendes Papirer: Kritik af en mislykket dannelsesroman?",
abstract = "My intent with the present piece is to show that in From the Papers of One Still Living, Published against His Will by S. Kjerkegaard (1838), Kierkegaard presents us with a critical review of Hans Christian Andersen{\textquoteright}s Only a Fiddler (1837), which he bases on his notion that Andersen{\textquoteright}s work is a failed attempt at a Bildungsroman. Following a brief presentation of the assumptions—both those concerning aesthetics and those that were typical of the period—implicit in Kierkegaard{\textquoteright}s review, I point out a number of aspects of Andersen{\textquoteright}s novel in connection with which I maintain that Kierkegaard himself does not live up to his own requirement that Andersen embrace a correct “outlook on life.” I support my argument by investigating the rhetoric of Kierkegaard{\textquoteright}s review, and I conclude by suggesting that both Kierkegaard and Andersen should be considered modern writers and that this is attributable, not least, to their break with the literary metaphysics of the Bildungsroman.",
author = "Joakim Garff",
year = "2022",
language = "Dansk",
isbn = "9788740834420",
volume = "2022",
pages = "51--68",
booktitle = "Danske Studier",
publisher = "Universitets-Jubil{\ae}ets danske Samfund",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Af en endnu Levendes Papirer

T2 - Kritik af en mislykket dannelsesroman?

AU - Garff, Joakim

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - My intent with the present piece is to show that in From the Papers of One Still Living, Published against His Will by S. Kjerkegaard (1838), Kierkegaard presents us with a critical review of Hans Christian Andersen’s Only a Fiddler (1837), which he bases on his notion that Andersen’s work is a failed attempt at a Bildungsroman. Following a brief presentation of the assumptions—both those concerning aesthetics and those that were typical of the period—implicit in Kierkegaard’s review, I point out a number of aspects of Andersen’s novel in connection with which I maintain that Kierkegaard himself does not live up to his own requirement that Andersen embrace a correct “outlook on life.” I support my argument by investigating the rhetoric of Kierkegaard’s review, and I conclude by suggesting that both Kierkegaard and Andersen should be considered modern writers and that this is attributable, not least, to their break with the literary metaphysics of the Bildungsroman.

AB - My intent with the present piece is to show that in From the Papers of One Still Living, Published against His Will by S. Kjerkegaard (1838), Kierkegaard presents us with a critical review of Hans Christian Andersen’s Only a Fiddler (1837), which he bases on his notion that Andersen’s work is a failed attempt at a Bildungsroman. Following a brief presentation of the assumptions—both those concerning aesthetics and those that were typical of the period—implicit in Kierkegaard’s review, I point out a number of aspects of Andersen’s novel in connection with which I maintain that Kierkegaard himself does not live up to his own requirement that Andersen embrace a correct “outlook on life.” I support my argument by investigating the rhetoric of Kierkegaard’s review, and I conclude by suggesting that both Kierkegaard and Andersen should be considered modern writers and that this is attributable, not least, to their break with the literary metaphysics of the Bildungsroman.

M3 - Bidrag til bog/antologi

SN - 9788740834420

VL - 2022

SP - 51

EP - 68

BT - Danske Studier

PB - Universitets-Jubilæets danske Samfund

ER -

ID: 310959384