Grotius’s Contract Theory in the Works of His German Commentators: First Explorations

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Grotius’s Contract Theory in the Works of His German Commentators: First Explorations. / Astorri, Paolo.

In: Grotiana, Vol. 41, 2020, p. 88-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Astorri, P 2020, 'Grotius’s Contract Theory in the Works of His German Commentators: First Explorations', Grotiana, vol. 41, pp. 88-107. https://doi.org/10.1163/18760759-04101005

APA

Astorri, P. (2020). Grotius’s Contract Theory in the Works of His German Commentators: First Explorations. Grotiana, 41, 88-107. https://doi.org/10.1163/18760759-04101005

Vancouver

Astorri P. Grotius’s Contract Theory in the Works of His German Commentators: First Explorations. Grotiana. 2020;41:88-107. https://doi.org/10.1163/18760759-04101005

Author

Astorri, Paolo. / Grotius’s Contract Theory in the Works of His German Commentators: First Explorations. In: Grotiana. 2020 ; Vol. 41. pp. 88-107.

Bibtex

@article{c505d8905d57494897d0460361fb6f0e,
title = "Grotius{\textquoteright}s Contract Theory in the Works of His German Commentators: First Explorations",
abstract = "Due to its enormous importance, Grotius{\textquoteright}s contract doctrine has been extensively investigated by legal historians. This paper seeks to enhance scholarly understanding of this topic by looking at commentaries on De jure belli ac pacis written by German theologians and jurists in the second half of the seventeenth century. The paper focuses on comments concerning promises: the criteria for promises that are binding under natural law; the foundations of the obligation to keep promises; error and duress; and immoral promises. Grotius{\textquoteright}s contract doctrine rested on a m{\'e}lange of sources, both theological and juridical, which were not always consistent. Commentators sought to harmonise them by looking at them from different perspectives: some comments were mainly based on interpretations of ius commune texts, whereas others reflected a moral theological approach. The results drew distinctions (directly or indirectly)between law and moral theology that contributed to the fragmentation ofGrotius{\textquoteright}s synthesis.",
author = "Paolo Astorri",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1163/18760759-04101005",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "88--107",
journal = "Grotiana",
issn = "0167-3831",
publisher = "Brill",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Grotius’s Contract Theory in the Works of His German Commentators: First Explorations

AU - Astorri, Paolo

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Due to its enormous importance, Grotius’s contract doctrine has been extensively investigated by legal historians. This paper seeks to enhance scholarly understanding of this topic by looking at commentaries on De jure belli ac pacis written by German theologians and jurists in the second half of the seventeenth century. The paper focuses on comments concerning promises: the criteria for promises that are binding under natural law; the foundations of the obligation to keep promises; error and duress; and immoral promises. Grotius’s contract doctrine rested on a mélange of sources, both theological and juridical, which were not always consistent. Commentators sought to harmonise them by looking at them from different perspectives: some comments were mainly based on interpretations of ius commune texts, whereas others reflected a moral theological approach. The results drew distinctions (directly or indirectly)between law and moral theology that contributed to the fragmentation ofGrotius’s synthesis.

AB - Due to its enormous importance, Grotius’s contract doctrine has been extensively investigated by legal historians. This paper seeks to enhance scholarly understanding of this topic by looking at commentaries on De jure belli ac pacis written by German theologians and jurists in the second half of the seventeenth century. The paper focuses on comments concerning promises: the criteria for promises that are binding under natural law; the foundations of the obligation to keep promises; error and duress; and immoral promises. Grotius’s contract doctrine rested on a mélange of sources, both theological and juridical, which were not always consistent. Commentators sought to harmonise them by looking at them from different perspectives: some comments were mainly based on interpretations of ius commune texts, whereas others reflected a moral theological approach. The results drew distinctions (directly or indirectly)between law and moral theology that contributed to the fragmentation ofGrotius’s synthesis.

U2 - 10.1163/18760759-04101005

DO - 10.1163/18760759-04101005

M3 - Journal article

VL - 41

SP - 88

EP - 107

JO - Grotiana

JF - Grotiana

SN - 0167-3831

ER -

ID: 243854056