The Lutheran Household as a Private Jurisdiction

Publikation: KonferencebidragKonferenceabstrakt til konferenceForskning

Standard

The Lutheran Household as a Private Jurisdiction. / Astorri, Paolo; Nørgaard, Lars Cyril.

2021. Abstract fra Nordic Variations of Protestant Governance. A series of NOS-HS workshops: Uppsala – Aarhus – Oslo. HOUSEHOLD. Workshop in Aarhus , Denmark, Danmark.

Publikation: KonferencebidragKonferenceabstrakt til konferenceForskning

Harvard

Astorri, P & Nørgaard, LC 2021, 'The Lutheran Household as a Private Jurisdiction', Nordic Variations of Protestant Governance. A series of NOS-HS workshops: Uppsala – Aarhus – Oslo. HOUSEHOLD. Workshop in Aarhus , Denmark, Danmark, 02/12/2021.

APA

Astorri, P., & Nørgaard, L. C. (2021). The Lutheran Household as a Private Jurisdiction. Abstract fra Nordic Variations of Protestant Governance. A series of NOS-HS workshops: Uppsala – Aarhus – Oslo. HOUSEHOLD. Workshop in Aarhus , Denmark, Danmark.

Vancouver

Astorri P, Nørgaard LC. The Lutheran Household as a Private Jurisdiction. 2021. Abstract fra Nordic Variations of Protestant Governance. A series of NOS-HS workshops: Uppsala – Aarhus – Oslo. HOUSEHOLD. Workshop in Aarhus , Denmark, Danmark.

Author

Astorri, Paolo ; Nørgaard, Lars Cyril. / The Lutheran Household as a Private Jurisdiction. Abstract fra Nordic Variations of Protestant Governance. A series of NOS-HS workshops: Uppsala – Aarhus – Oslo. HOUSEHOLD. Workshop in Aarhus , Denmark, Danmark.

Bibtex

@conference{24ae6d08e4044948b18eff942d253ca5,
title = "The Lutheran Household as a Private Jurisdiction",
abstract = "Within early modern Lutheranism, the household took on special importance. Indeed, Luther{\textquoteright}s three estates paralleled the married couple alongside the state and the church: equal before God, these estates were governed by a structurally similar and divinely ordained authority: the prince, the husband, and the priest. Thus, these three figures of authority engendered multiple overlapping jurisdictions, which in turn shaped the borders between public and private. Of course, the overlap between the domestic sphere, ecclesiastical policies and civil society was no Lutheran invention: a similar overlap can be identified in Aristoteles, and his medieval and early modern commentators were certainly not blind to it. Nevertheless, Lutheran theologians and jurists developed a new vocabulary for thinking about the household and its position within the social world, which influenced the everyday life and practice of families and would pave the way for the 19th-century construction of the family as a separate entity within the Scandinavian countries.In our contribution, we propose to study the household as a {\textquoteleft}private{\textquoteright} jurisdiction, and the relationship between this jurisdiction and the {\textquoteleft}public{\textquoteright} jurisdiction of the state. More specifically, we investigate the scope and extent of paternal authority within the household and the reconceptualization of marriage governance in the broader context of early modern Lutheran societies. The article includes three main sections. A first section outlines the Lutheran theory of the household as initially developed in Luther{\textquoteright}s writings on Genesis, the Song of Songs, the Gospel of Matthew and the treatises on marriage, but also in Melanchthon{\textquoteright}s commentaries on Aristoteles. A second section briefly traces the figure of the father and the status of the married couple in 16th-century theologians and jurists like Erasmus Sarcerius (1501-1559), Niels Hemmingsen (1513-1600), Joachim von Beust (1522-1597), and others. A third section documents how key developments were accomplished in 17th-century works like De jure connubiorum commentarius politicus by Henning Arnisaeus (1570-1636), De coniugio clericorum tractatus by Georg Calixtus (1586-1656), and the Biblische Policey by Dietrich Reinking (1590-1664). The latter work was dedicated to the Danish king Frederik III and can be viewed as an almost epitome of the scholarly discourse on the household, which we propose to elucidate. ",
author = "Paolo Astorri and N{\o}rgaard, {Lars Cyril}",
year = "2021",
language = "English",
note = "Nordic Variations of Protestant Governance. A series of NOS-HS workshops: Uppsala – Aarhus – Oslo. HOUSEHOLD. Workshop in Aarhus ; Conference date: 02-12-2021",

}

RIS

TY - ABST

T1 - The Lutheran Household as a Private Jurisdiction

AU - Astorri, Paolo

AU - Nørgaard, Lars Cyril

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Within early modern Lutheranism, the household took on special importance. Indeed, Luther’s three estates paralleled the married couple alongside the state and the church: equal before God, these estates were governed by a structurally similar and divinely ordained authority: the prince, the husband, and the priest. Thus, these three figures of authority engendered multiple overlapping jurisdictions, which in turn shaped the borders between public and private. Of course, the overlap between the domestic sphere, ecclesiastical policies and civil society was no Lutheran invention: a similar overlap can be identified in Aristoteles, and his medieval and early modern commentators were certainly not blind to it. Nevertheless, Lutheran theologians and jurists developed a new vocabulary for thinking about the household and its position within the social world, which influenced the everyday life and practice of families and would pave the way for the 19th-century construction of the family as a separate entity within the Scandinavian countries.In our contribution, we propose to study the household as a ‘private’ jurisdiction, and the relationship between this jurisdiction and the ‘public’ jurisdiction of the state. More specifically, we investigate the scope and extent of paternal authority within the household and the reconceptualization of marriage governance in the broader context of early modern Lutheran societies. The article includes three main sections. A first section outlines the Lutheran theory of the household as initially developed in Luther’s writings on Genesis, the Song of Songs, the Gospel of Matthew and the treatises on marriage, but also in Melanchthon’s commentaries on Aristoteles. A second section briefly traces the figure of the father and the status of the married couple in 16th-century theologians and jurists like Erasmus Sarcerius (1501-1559), Niels Hemmingsen (1513-1600), Joachim von Beust (1522-1597), and others. A third section documents how key developments were accomplished in 17th-century works like De jure connubiorum commentarius politicus by Henning Arnisaeus (1570-1636), De coniugio clericorum tractatus by Georg Calixtus (1586-1656), and the Biblische Policey by Dietrich Reinking (1590-1664). The latter work was dedicated to the Danish king Frederik III and can be viewed as an almost epitome of the scholarly discourse on the household, which we propose to elucidate.

AB - Within early modern Lutheranism, the household took on special importance. Indeed, Luther’s three estates paralleled the married couple alongside the state and the church: equal before God, these estates were governed by a structurally similar and divinely ordained authority: the prince, the husband, and the priest. Thus, these three figures of authority engendered multiple overlapping jurisdictions, which in turn shaped the borders between public and private. Of course, the overlap between the domestic sphere, ecclesiastical policies and civil society was no Lutheran invention: a similar overlap can be identified in Aristoteles, and his medieval and early modern commentators were certainly not blind to it. Nevertheless, Lutheran theologians and jurists developed a new vocabulary for thinking about the household and its position within the social world, which influenced the everyday life and practice of families and would pave the way for the 19th-century construction of the family as a separate entity within the Scandinavian countries.In our contribution, we propose to study the household as a ‘private’ jurisdiction, and the relationship between this jurisdiction and the ‘public’ jurisdiction of the state. More specifically, we investigate the scope and extent of paternal authority within the household and the reconceptualization of marriage governance in the broader context of early modern Lutheran societies. The article includes three main sections. A first section outlines the Lutheran theory of the household as initially developed in Luther’s writings on Genesis, the Song of Songs, the Gospel of Matthew and the treatises on marriage, but also in Melanchthon’s commentaries on Aristoteles. A second section briefly traces the figure of the father and the status of the married couple in 16th-century theologians and jurists like Erasmus Sarcerius (1501-1559), Niels Hemmingsen (1513-1600), Joachim von Beust (1522-1597), and others. A third section documents how key developments were accomplished in 17th-century works like De jure connubiorum commentarius politicus by Henning Arnisaeus (1570-1636), De coniugio clericorum tractatus by Georg Calixtus (1586-1656), and the Biblische Policey by Dietrich Reinking (1590-1664). The latter work was dedicated to the Danish king Frederik III and can be viewed as an almost epitome of the scholarly discourse on the household, which we propose to elucidate.

M3 - Conference abstract for conference

T2 - Nordic Variations of Protestant Governance. A series of NOS-HS workshops: Uppsala – Aarhus – Oslo. HOUSEHOLD. Workshop in Aarhus

Y2 - 2 December 2021

ER -

ID: 308548363