Regulating Nonreligion in Denmark: A Case of Banal Discrimination?

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Regulating Nonreligion in Denmark: A Case of Banal Discrimination? / Vinding, Niels Valdemar; Mauritsen, Anne Lundahl.

The complex world of philosophical and non–religious beliefs. red. / Antonio Angelucci . Editorial Comares, 2023.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Vinding, NV & Mauritsen, AL 2023, Regulating Nonreligion in Denmark: A Case of Banal Discrimination? i A Angelucci (red.), The complex world of philosophical and non–religious beliefs. Editorial Comares.

APA

Vinding, N. V., & Mauritsen, A. L. (Accepteret/In press). Regulating Nonreligion in Denmark: A Case of Banal Discrimination? I A. Angelucci (red.), The complex world of philosophical and non–religious beliefs Editorial Comares.

Vancouver

Vinding NV, Mauritsen AL. Regulating Nonreligion in Denmark: A Case of Banal Discrimination? I Angelucci A, red., The complex world of philosophical and non–religious beliefs. Editorial Comares. 2023

Author

Vinding, Niels Valdemar ; Mauritsen, Anne Lundahl. / Regulating Nonreligion in Denmark: A Case of Banal Discrimination?. The complex world of philosophical and non–religious beliefs. red. / Antonio Angelucci . Editorial Comares, 2023.

Bibtex

@inbook{23ae02c803b84da0aa125032435c4d5d,
title = "Regulating Nonreligion in Denmark: A Case of Banal Discrimination?",
abstract = "This report is the first attempt to map the regulation of nonreligion and the nonreligious in Denmark. However, while this report might be the first of its kind from the Danish context, it does not exist in a vacuum. Rather, it contributes to the expanding study of nonreligion, which has become an influential field of its own over the past 20 years, both generally and in Denmark. This, too, includes the study of the legal perspectives on nonreligion, towards which scholars have also begun to turn their gazeThus, we focus on the importance of conceptual clarity in researching the regulation of the nonreligions and argue for the existence of a religious default bias in Denmark, which does not cater to the nonreligious. The report follows the structure of these two main points. We first discuss and introduce the concept and field of nonreligion, generally and specifically in Denmark. Next, we present three different case studies. Following this presentation, we discuss the practical challenges which this default-bias creates, and finally, we discuss the integration of the nonreligious in the Evangelical-Lutheran Church of Denmark and point to interesting avenues for research in the future. ",
author = "Vinding, {Niels Valdemar} and Mauritsen, {Anne Lundahl}",
year = "2023",
month = nov,
day = "1",
language = "English",
editor = "{ Angelucci }, Antonio",
booktitle = "The complex world of philosophical and non–religious beliefs",
publisher = "Editorial Comares",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Regulating Nonreligion in Denmark: A Case of Banal Discrimination?

AU - Vinding, Niels Valdemar

AU - Mauritsen, Anne Lundahl

PY - 2023/11/1

Y1 - 2023/11/1

N2 - This report is the first attempt to map the regulation of nonreligion and the nonreligious in Denmark. However, while this report might be the first of its kind from the Danish context, it does not exist in a vacuum. Rather, it contributes to the expanding study of nonreligion, which has become an influential field of its own over the past 20 years, both generally and in Denmark. This, too, includes the study of the legal perspectives on nonreligion, towards which scholars have also begun to turn their gazeThus, we focus on the importance of conceptual clarity in researching the regulation of the nonreligions and argue for the existence of a religious default bias in Denmark, which does not cater to the nonreligious. The report follows the structure of these two main points. We first discuss and introduce the concept and field of nonreligion, generally and specifically in Denmark. Next, we present three different case studies. Following this presentation, we discuss the practical challenges which this default-bias creates, and finally, we discuss the integration of the nonreligious in the Evangelical-Lutheran Church of Denmark and point to interesting avenues for research in the future.

AB - This report is the first attempt to map the regulation of nonreligion and the nonreligious in Denmark. However, while this report might be the first of its kind from the Danish context, it does not exist in a vacuum. Rather, it contributes to the expanding study of nonreligion, which has become an influential field of its own over the past 20 years, both generally and in Denmark. This, too, includes the study of the legal perspectives on nonreligion, towards which scholars have also begun to turn their gazeThus, we focus on the importance of conceptual clarity in researching the regulation of the nonreligions and argue for the existence of a religious default bias in Denmark, which does not cater to the nonreligious. The report follows the structure of these two main points. We first discuss and introduce the concept and field of nonreligion, generally and specifically in Denmark. Next, we present three different case studies. Following this presentation, we discuss the practical challenges which this default-bias creates, and finally, we discuss the integration of the nonreligious in the Evangelical-Lutheran Church of Denmark and point to interesting avenues for research in the future.

UR - https://www.churchstate.eu/publications/proceedings-meetings.html

M3 - Book chapter

BT - The complex world of philosophical and non–religious beliefs

A2 - Angelucci , Antonio

PB - Editorial Comares

ER -

ID: 366641178