Health Promotion, Governmentality and the Challenges of Theorizing Pleasure and Desire

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Health Promotion, Governmentality and the Challenges of Theorizing Pleasure and Desire. / Karlsen, Mads Peter; Villadsen, Kaspar.

I: Body & Society, Nr. November 2015, 2015, s. 1-28.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Karlsen, MP & Villadsen, K 2015, 'Health Promotion, Governmentality and the Challenges of Theorizing Pleasure and Desire', Body & Society, nr. November 2015, s. 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X15616465

APA

Karlsen, M. P., & Villadsen, K. (2015). Health Promotion, Governmentality and the Challenges of Theorizing Pleasure and Desire. Body & Society, (November 2015), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X15616465

Vancouver

Karlsen MP, Villadsen K. Health Promotion, Governmentality and the Challenges of Theorizing Pleasure and Desire. Body & Society. 2015;(November 2015):1-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X15616465

Author

Karlsen, Mads Peter ; Villadsen, Kaspar. / Health Promotion, Governmentality and the Challenges of Theorizing Pleasure and Desire. I: Body & Society. 2015 ; Nr. November 2015. s. 1-28.

Bibtex

@article{2618534fed4845dfb710d47068c7ecb2,
title = "Health Promotion, Governmentality and the Challenges of Theorizing Pleasure and Desire",
abstract = "The relationship between pleasure and asceticism has been at the core of debates on western subjectivity at least since Nietzsche. Addressing this theme, this article explores the emergence of {\textquoteleft}non-authoritarian{\textquoteright} health campaigns, which do not propagate abstention from harmful substances but intend to foster a {\textquoteleft}well-balanced subject{\textquoteright} straddling pleasure and asceticism. The article seeks to develop the Foucauldian analytical framework by foregrounding a strategy of subjectivation that integrates desire, pleasure and enjoyment into health promotion. The point of departure is the overwhelming emphasis in the governmentality literature on {\textquoteleft}prudence{\textquoteright}, {\textquoteleft}self-responsibility{\textquoteright} or {\textquoteleft}risk calculation{\textquoteright}, such that pleasure and desire remain largely absent from the framework. Some insights from {\v Z}i{\v z}ek{\textquoteright}s work are introduced to help us obtain a firmer grasp on the problematic of {\textquoteleft}the well-balanced subject{\textquoteright}. The article argues that, in order to analyse the transformation of interpellation in recent health promotion, we must recognize the mechanism of self-distance or dis-identification as an integral part of the procedure of subjectification.",
author = "Karlsen, {Mads Peter} and Kaspar Villadsen",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1177/1357034X15616465",
language = "English",
pages = "1--28",
journal = "Body & Society",
issn = "1357-034X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "November 2015",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health Promotion, Governmentality and the Challenges of Theorizing Pleasure and Desire

AU - Karlsen, Mads Peter

AU - Villadsen, Kaspar

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The relationship between pleasure and asceticism has been at the core of debates on western subjectivity at least since Nietzsche. Addressing this theme, this article explores the emergence of ‘non-authoritarian’ health campaigns, which do not propagate abstention from harmful substances but intend to foster a ‘well-balanced subject’ straddling pleasure and asceticism. The article seeks to develop the Foucauldian analytical framework by foregrounding a strategy of subjectivation that integrates desire, pleasure and enjoyment into health promotion. The point of departure is the overwhelming emphasis in the governmentality literature on ‘prudence’, ‘self-responsibility’ or ‘risk calculation’, such that pleasure and desire remain largely absent from the framework. Some insights from Žižek’s work are introduced to help us obtain a firmer grasp on the problematic of ‘the well-balanced subject’. The article argues that, in order to analyse the transformation of interpellation in recent health promotion, we must recognize the mechanism of self-distance or dis-identification as an integral part of the procedure of subjectification.

AB - The relationship between pleasure and asceticism has been at the core of debates on western subjectivity at least since Nietzsche. Addressing this theme, this article explores the emergence of ‘non-authoritarian’ health campaigns, which do not propagate abstention from harmful substances but intend to foster a ‘well-balanced subject’ straddling pleasure and asceticism. The article seeks to develop the Foucauldian analytical framework by foregrounding a strategy of subjectivation that integrates desire, pleasure and enjoyment into health promotion. The point of departure is the overwhelming emphasis in the governmentality literature on ‘prudence’, ‘self-responsibility’ or ‘risk calculation’, such that pleasure and desire remain largely absent from the framework. Some insights from Žižek’s work are introduced to help us obtain a firmer grasp on the problematic of ‘the well-balanced subject’. The article argues that, in order to analyse the transformation of interpellation in recent health promotion, we must recognize the mechanism of self-distance or dis-identification as an integral part of the procedure of subjectification.

U2 - 10.1177/1357034X15616465

DO - 10.1177/1357034X15616465

M3 - Journal article

SP - 1

EP - 28

JO - Body & Society

JF - Body & Society

SN - 1357-034X

IS - November 2015

ER -

ID: 56068627