The Positive Role of Culture in Barth and Tillich's Discussion of the Paradox in 1923

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

The Positive Role of Culture in Barth and Tillich's Discussion of the Paradox in 1923. / Kristensen, Anne-Milla Wichmann.

Crisis and Reorientation: Karl Barth’s Römerbrief in the Cultural and Intellectual Context of Post WWI Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, 2023. s. 101-121.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Kristensen, A-MW 2023, The Positive Role of Culture in Barth and Tillich's Discussion of the Paradox in 1923. i Crisis and Reorientation: Karl Barth’s Römerbrief in the Cultural and Intellectual Context of Post WWI Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, s. 101-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27677-4_6

APA

Kristensen, A-M. W. (2023). The Positive Role of Culture in Barth and Tillich's Discussion of the Paradox in 1923. I Crisis and Reorientation: Karl Barth’s Römerbrief in the Cultural and Intellectual Context of Post WWI Europe (s. 101-121). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27677-4_6

Vancouver

Kristensen A-MW. The Positive Role of Culture in Barth and Tillich's Discussion of the Paradox in 1923. I Crisis and Reorientation: Karl Barth’s Römerbrief in the Cultural and Intellectual Context of Post WWI Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. 2023. s. 101-121 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27677-4_6

Author

Kristensen, Anne-Milla Wichmann. / The Positive Role of Culture in Barth and Tillich's Discussion of the Paradox in 1923. Crisis and Reorientation: Karl Barth’s Römerbrief in the Cultural and Intellectual Context of Post WWI Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, 2023. s. 101-121

Bibtex

@inbook{bc77144c1ef946479f60853791c2b1fe,
title = "The Positive Role of Culture in Barth and Tillich's Discussion of the Paradox in 1923",
abstract = "Paul Tillich and Karl Barth discuss their theological approaches in Theologische Bl{\"a}tter at the beginning of the twentieth century. Both theologians concentrate on a theology referred to as a “theology of crisis” in response to the liberal theology of the nineteenth century. Tillich wants Barth to accept the “positive root” of the critical paradox, which Tillich argues is presupposed in the critical version of the paradox in Barth{\textquoteright}s theology. In this chapter, I lay out the discussion between Tillich and Barth from 1923 and show that the actual conflict in the exchange between the two thinkers concerns the question whether there is a positive role of culture in theology and, if there is, how we should understand that role.",
author = "Kristensen, {Anne-Milla Wichmann}",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-031-27677-4_6",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-031-27676-7",
pages = "101--121",
booktitle = "Crisis and Reorientation",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Positive Role of Culture in Barth and Tillich's Discussion of the Paradox in 1923

AU - Kristensen, Anne-Milla Wichmann

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Paul Tillich and Karl Barth discuss their theological approaches in Theologische Blätter at the beginning of the twentieth century. Both theologians concentrate on a theology referred to as a “theology of crisis” in response to the liberal theology of the nineteenth century. Tillich wants Barth to accept the “positive root” of the critical paradox, which Tillich argues is presupposed in the critical version of the paradox in Barth’s theology. In this chapter, I lay out the discussion between Tillich and Barth from 1923 and show that the actual conflict in the exchange between the two thinkers concerns the question whether there is a positive role of culture in theology and, if there is, how we should understand that role.

AB - Paul Tillich and Karl Barth discuss their theological approaches in Theologische Blätter at the beginning of the twentieth century. Both theologians concentrate on a theology referred to as a “theology of crisis” in response to the liberal theology of the nineteenth century. Tillich wants Barth to accept the “positive root” of the critical paradox, which Tillich argues is presupposed in the critical version of the paradox in Barth’s theology. In this chapter, I lay out the discussion between Tillich and Barth from 1923 and show that the actual conflict in the exchange between the two thinkers concerns the question whether there is a positive role of culture in theology and, if there is, how we should understand that role.

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-27677-4_6

DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-27677-4_6

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 978-3-031-27676-7

SP - 101

EP - 121

BT - Crisis and Reorientation

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

ER -

ID: 379786222