“’Quietismus Sacer’ – Engaging Religious Adversaries”

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

“’Quietismus Sacer’ – Engaging Religious Adversaries”. / Mejrup, Kristian.

I: Zutot, Bind 16, 2019, s. 68-82.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Mejrup, K 2019, '“’Quietismus Sacer’ – Engaging Religious Adversaries”', Zutot, bind 16, s. 68-82. https://doi.org/10.1163/18750214-12161003

APA

Mejrup, K. (2019). “’Quietismus Sacer’ – Engaging Religious Adversaries”. Zutot, 16, 68-82. https://doi.org/10.1163/18750214-12161003

Vancouver

Mejrup K. “’Quietismus Sacer’ – Engaging Religious Adversaries”. Zutot. 2019;16:68-82. https://doi.org/10.1163/18750214-12161003

Author

Mejrup, Kristian. / “’Quietismus Sacer’ – Engaging Religious Adversaries”. I: Zutot. 2019 ; Bind 16. s. 68-82.

Bibtex

@article{474bc525c8274dcda384790def8c1c99,
title = "“{\textquoteright}Quietismus Sacer{\textquoteright} – Engaging Religious Adversaries”",
abstract = "This essay explores a critical reaction to the turbulence born out of the debate on Quietism at the end of the 17th century. Caspar Exner (1627–1704), a minister and sub- scriber to Lutheran Orthodoxy, wrote a report in 1689 on the recent outburst of what in his view was misleading theological assumptions. His refutation of so-called false doctrines turned out to be an ambiguous road for engaging religious adversaries. Urged to assess a specific and contested topic, Exner developed a method that confronted religious renewal in general. It is the aim of this essay to demonstrate how rectification was a means for appropriating and moderating contested ideas and surpassing confessional boundaries.",
author = "Kristian Mejrup",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1163/18750214-12161003",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "68--82",
journal = "Zutot",
issn = "1571-7283",
publisher = "Brill",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - “’Quietismus Sacer’ – Engaging Religious Adversaries”

AU - Mejrup, Kristian

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This essay explores a critical reaction to the turbulence born out of the debate on Quietism at the end of the 17th century. Caspar Exner (1627–1704), a minister and sub- scriber to Lutheran Orthodoxy, wrote a report in 1689 on the recent outburst of what in his view was misleading theological assumptions. His refutation of so-called false doctrines turned out to be an ambiguous road for engaging religious adversaries. Urged to assess a specific and contested topic, Exner developed a method that confronted religious renewal in general. It is the aim of this essay to demonstrate how rectification was a means for appropriating and moderating contested ideas and surpassing confessional boundaries.

AB - This essay explores a critical reaction to the turbulence born out of the debate on Quietism at the end of the 17th century. Caspar Exner (1627–1704), a minister and sub- scriber to Lutheran Orthodoxy, wrote a report in 1689 on the recent outburst of what in his view was misleading theological assumptions. His refutation of so-called false doctrines turned out to be an ambiguous road for engaging religious adversaries. Urged to assess a specific and contested topic, Exner developed a method that confronted religious renewal in general. It is the aim of this essay to demonstrate how rectification was a means for appropriating and moderating contested ideas and surpassing confessional boundaries.

U2 - 10.1163/18750214-12161003

DO - 10.1163/18750214-12161003

M3 - Journal article

VL - 16

SP - 68

EP - 82

JO - Zutot

JF - Zutot

SN - 1571-7283

ER -

ID: 219938808